Consequentialist and deontological ethics essay

The issue is how do you measure if something has positive or negative affects on the outcome? One of the more commonly used arguments was that vulgar acts, such as orgiastic sex might produce greater transient pleasure than some disciplined higher act such as studying fine poetry.

Are Now Displayed on One Page. Bush may have said that the war overall benefits America because we are reducing terrorism on our soil. Under Deontology It Consequentialist and deontological ethics essay an immoral action to lie, so by saying yes your action of giving up the hiding Jews is morally permissible.

For example, suppose a ruler wished to revive the Roman practice of public crucifixion of criminals. In other words, it is not the action itself that is being judged, it is the outcome or consequences of the action that determine its morality.

If she tells him, he might be brave enough to face it and spend his last days with his family, which is a good consequence.

Deontology vs. Consequentialism Essay Sample

He argued that these are inviolable duties, rules which must be followed absolutely and in every possible situation. In simpler terms, this means that actions are judged on whether or not society, or god, or any predetermined standard believes them to be okay.

Pluralistic Deontology It states a list of prime duties to be considered prior to deciding which duty should be performed when. I follow a utilitarian approach in the sense of trying to maximize the good that I bring to people, but with an awareness that there are categorical situations beyond which I will not go.

Another issue that comes about from the Measurement Problem is the issues of indefinite future. Consequentialism is the school of thought which asserts that the morality of a given action is to be judged by the consequence of that action.

Then again, if she does not tell him, it may be mentally traumatic for him to know whether he is going to live or die. People must act from duty. Lets look at an example of why I think Deontology is impracticable and counteractive.

Even though it is a war, president Bush believed that fighting the war would prevent farther terrorism on American soil. The second is tricky cases, how do you apply deontology to cases like truthful gossip or killing in wartime?

Kay, Deontological ethical theories are strongest in the areas where utilitarian theories face the greatest difficulty. Like other men, he wished that things would go well. Virtue Ethics As mentioned earlier, this theory solely focuses on ideals.

For instance, consider an individual who is the bank manager, and his own son has been caught in the act of robbing the bank.

By again using the Iraq example we can demonstrate this issue. Even though some of the actions have questionable morality, over all, the outcome is good.

A deontology, that is, may insist that rightness is an intrinsic, rather than an extrinsic, property of some actions. A deontologist might argue that, nonetheless, your duty is to ensure that you do not lie. I follow a utilitarian approach in the sense of trying to maximize the good that I bring to people, but with an awareness that there are categorical situations beyond which I will not go.

No single idea captures all of the features in virtue of which an ethical theory may deserve to be called a deontology. Another principle of Deontology is that the humanity principle, which states that you must always treat humanity with respect Robbins, Deontology 7.

But Kant insisted that as far as the moral evaluation of our actions was concerned, consequences did not matter. A theory which regarded the prohibition of lying as agent-neutral, however, would object that surely if one lie is bad, twenty would be much worse.

But philosophers mean to convey more by calling a theory deontological. No matter how much the public wants this spectacle, it must be dismissed from our moral deliberations.

University of Missouri, Columbia. What this denial comes to, however, depends on whether it is meant in a normative or in a metaethical sense. However, Deontology judges morality based on the actions themselves, while Consequentialism judges morality based on the end reaction.

No matter how much the public wants this spectacle, it must be dismissed from our moral deliberations. Who is to decide what consequence is right in this case? I think most people would disagree with this and say that it would be much more moral to lie and in return help the Jew stay safe.

Virtue ethics state that the man must be ideal and righteous and moral, and have the criminal punished despite the fact that he is his son.Introduction This essay will provide a theoretical understanding of the four ethical frameworks: Consequentialism, Non- Consequentialism, Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics.

When applied to a situation these frameworks help teachers to resolve and justify their decision making. The Theory: Deontology, Consequentialism, And Virtue Ethics Words | 7 Pages. 2. Alternative that I chose Under all three theories – deontology, consequentialism, and virtue ethics, providing my customers all information that I was aware of should be the most appropriate course of action that I.

The deontological theory has impacted on psychological research as it argues that human beings are equal so "act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law" (Kant, p.

). Deontological Ethics This Essay Deontological Ethics and other 64,+ term papers, such as consequentialism, argues that some overall ranking of goods always determines what one ought to do, it gives the good a normative priority over the right, and so is a teleological theory.

A Comparison: Consequentialism Vs. Deontology Vs. Virtue Ethics

A deontology, that is, may insist that rightness is an 4/4(1). The paper briefly compares deontological ethics and consequential ethics- it considers the nature of these theories separately and then contrasts them.

Deontological Ethics

Finally, the paper acknowledges that the consequential ethical theory has many flaws, but argues that such flaws should not overcome the positive aspects of the Consequentialist theory.

In conclusion, consequentialism looks at the consequences whereas deontology places importance of the right action to be fundamental to ethics.

Consequentialism links with the BPS guideline in explaining psychological research e.g. Burger () and Reicher and Haslam ().

Download
Consequentialist and deontological ethics essay
Rated 4/5 based on 47 review